Uddrag fra notes, [9-40OHK] 109-0330

28.15 The functions Between the definitions are determinations, since the definitions designed to he placed early in the sequence (or system) of definitions are presupposed by those designed to fol- low later, but not vice versa. (I. a,, the translation of 'be- etaer' by 'exist* seems to me objectionable and might involve metephysical implications which are not Intended.) 2£.25 'tilvant*: familiar (not: usual). 29.22 with the text: within the text. M4- 29*25/ morphology and syntax, the necessity of which has been insisted on by conventional linguistics ever sinde antiquity, and wnieh we shall shortly be led to abandon as inadequate—this time, incident, ally, in agreement with several modern schools. The logical con- sequence of maintaining this distinction must be—end sore© schol- she have been willing to accept this consoqtience—that /aomhology lsps iteelf only to a description of systems end syntax only to a description, of sequences. 50.10 Hsnee the preoccupation with raction. |^,12 But. it is easy to see, even in terms of familiar concents, that there are within the word dap endendes completely analogous to those of the smatinoe and susceptible, mutrtis mutandisr to the same kind of analysis and description. The structure of a lan- guega rer.y bo such that 0 word-stem can appear both VMVK'tlXmm fKKtiWtMVtVti. with and without derivatives. Under this condition, there is then selection between the derivative ending and the steau 50.2D The terms of conventional linguistics (morphology> are thus, in the lest resort, inevitably breed on selection Just like the terms primary end secondary clause, (i. a., the translation of 'selva* by »even* is s mistatø. ) 3H.26 For /'nemlig'/ it is immediately eoparent that, under certain structural conditions, the sol ids rityfb at ween the nominal morphemes my be replaced ... 1 51*6 here, then, there is selection. Combination emerges, e. as soon as we consider each case end number separately instead of studying, as w« did above, the relation between the whole case -paradigm and the whole number-paradigm. 31.13 under certain structural conditions, which are very common, it is possible to distinguish between a central part of the syllable (the vowel, or sonant) and a marginal part (the consonant, or non-sonant) 31.19 This principle is, indeed, the basis of a definition of vowel and consonant, long forgotten by ihu pundits hut still, I believe, maintained in elementary schools and undoubtedly inherited from